We were recently asked concerning Jesus' account of the servant who, upon his master's return, was punished for having failed a responsibility of which he had not been aware (Luke 12:47-48). Understandably, another servant who knew but arrogantly defied the master's will was punished much more severely.
But, what of the one who did not know or understand his assigned duties? Did not Jesus affirm the relationship of knowledge to judgment (John 9:41; 15:22,24; cf. Rom. 2:14-16)? On the surface, the question seems difficult and has been often asked. As usual, context explains content.
Jesus has been speaking to the Disciples concerning preparedness in relation to his return (Luke 12:35-40). At this point Peter asks whether his remarks apply to all or to the Twelve specifically (vs. 41). Jesus replies that he is addressing them personally as representating those to whom the role of oversight is assigned in the master's house and household. Of such office and calling, James notes that those engaged in teaching, for example, "shall incur a stricter judgment" (Js. 3:1). In other words, spiritual leadership is to be taken seriously.
Both Paul and Peter were considerably exercised by those failing - for whatever reason - to live up to the ministerial standard. For some, the objective was financial ("sordid gain," Tit. 1:11; I Pet. 5:2); for others, dominance and control (II Cor. 11:19-20; interestingly, Paul here notes some in the Corinthian Church with a warped need to be so dominated; cf. also desire for spiritual bondage, Gal. 4:1); for some the pursuit and promotion of personal self-interest prevailed (Phil. 2:19-21); while yet others evidenced a need to be seen and heard, despite not knowing what they were talking about (I Tim. 1:6-7), etc.
Again, Jesus' emphasis here deals with commitment in leadership. While not expressly stated in his exhortation, a further point of significance nonetheless inheres: One does well to seek an understanding of the master's will in serving the household of faith. Might it be that the servant had somehow fallen short at this point? We are not told. It is food for thought, however.
Burl Ratzsch
